Archives of:
Monsieur Renaissance : le forum de discussion
Hello, and welcome to the
Mr. Renaissance discussion forum archives. While the entries below can no longer be added to or edited, you may post your thoughts and interact with others at the
current forum.
Re (1): New Age, Visulization, etc
IP: 146.7.16.63
Posted on November 18, 2004 at 03:24:09 PM by Eric
Hello,
One thing that I should clarify from the onset that is not made clear in
my testimony is that I was never able to read another person's thoughts. That seemed to be the logical conclusion at the time, for we process all new experiences through the lens of previous knowledge and experience. I tried to reconstruct my experience as it happened which required me to recount my various explanations as they occurred.
As to your question about my temptation to open such doors again, there is none. I find that world rather confusing and disconcerting and could live a long and prosperous life without ever having another auditory/visionary experience. There are times in which I do seem to border close to the edge, and these times are generally when I am run ragged and stressed out over the constant deadline of the college life. However, I think we are ultimately headed in two different directions here. The thing that changed my life was not of the same element that changed your friend's life; what changed my life was that my experiences brought me into a relationship with God. What I longed for was not some existential benefit afforded me by an esoteric wisdom, but something solid and tangible with which to connect.
What your friend has likely discovered is not truly spiritual per se at all. I believe that many of these principles are simply an as-of-yet-unexplained aspect of the physical universe. Think, for example, how mysterious electricity would have seemed before it became the consumer good it is today. The Greeks were aware of static electricity (though they did not thoroughly understand it) and here and there we read of other people who noted unusual things happened under certain predictable, though unexplained, circumstances. We can very easily imagine someone confronted with electricity and believing it magical.
In a similar manner, I believe that most Eastern and occult theory is little more than the observation of physical phenomenon. For example, acupressure and acupuncture are based on a theory that posits energy meridians throughout the body and that when these channels become blocked, ill health results. There is little doubt that we have a bio-chemical (and therefore electrical) constitution to our bodies. We further know that the spinal cord threads from the base of our skull down our backbone and is connected via nerve ends to virtually every part of our body. It is not hard to conceive that if I stick a pin in my toe it will have an effect on some other part of my body via this central highway of nerve fibers transmitting bio-chemical impulses (or, in other words, that it would affect "energy flow").
Now then, it is not that there is no overlap between these realms, for we are beings, as it were, who have one foot in the physical realm the other in the spiritual. I would refer you to the (online) chapter entitled
Mysticism and Magic from Evelyn Underhill's classic book
Mysticism if you would like an involved explanation of the difference, in this case, between magic and mysticism and how these realms operate. Do you see how a study of these lesser known aspects of the physical universe in and of itself answers little more than that of any empirical study? By itself, the existence of electricity (to continue with our example) tells us nothing more or less about the question of God: it is but another created thing. As I write in this week's newsletter
The Wind Bloweth Where it Listeth, faith has often been regarded as being subjective and therefore untrustworthy, but it is the only key that will open the door to God. Further, this bias operates under the assumption that the tool we call empiricism is the greatest and most reliable of all knowledge producing tools and that any other tool we might employ to discern objective reality is necessarily questionable at best. But, whether we like it or not, the tool of faith is what is required when we examine
the question of God and it is only by the answer to that question that we will find any lasting meaning.
The lesser known aspects of the physical universe bear the fingerprints of an infinite and all-powerful God, but if we try to find lasting meaning in the fingerprints themselves, our answer will necessarily be lacking and inherently unsatisfying. Meaning will only be found by a pursuit of the Fingerprint Originator. And when a person finds God, these things then take on new meaning as well—we have a renewed capacity to enjoy them—whereas taking them in and of themselves soon proves a hollow and substanceless enterprise.
I have written of all of these things and more; one can find them all over the site if he but cares to look—particularly in the
newsletters. For now, I will just excerpt the end of the April 23, 2003, newsletter
Eternal Portraits in Everlasting Fellowship, for you see, what changed my life was not uncovering lesser known principles of the universe. It was Christ that made the difference; the voices were simply the avenue through which He called His prodigal son home and that is about as much regard as I give them these days. So then, as per
Eternal Portraits in Everlasting Fellowship, here is my basic hope and theology in a thousand words or less:
I used to wonder why theologians teach that we are God's hands and feet: that we are, to each other, "God with skin on." To me, this seemed to lay one in the lap of the skeptic, for it makes it quite convenient to cover for a God who is not there. After all, you want to see God? He isn't there, but His people think He is: they think they themselves are Him. I began to realize, however, that the reason we are to be God's hands and feet is not because anyone is trying to cover for the lack of His presence, but because we will not be alone in the celestial city. Only God can fill the vacuum, but how much sweeter this gift if shared with another! Do you not long to take someone with you when you are moved by the sunrise or the sunset, the majesty of the mountain height, the song that speaks to your heart, the poem that brings tears to your eyes, the baby smiling from its crib? Have you ever thought about why you desire to share it?
We were not created in a vacuum. We were created to bring one another pleasure even as we share, creature to creature before Creator, in God's pleasure. In heaven, we will not be alone. We are meant to enjoy one another, to share with one another, and this is precisely why we are God's hands and feet. He alone can fill the vacuum, but He has chosen to give us good gifts that give our lives even greater pleasure. And what is His good pleasure? Simply to give us pleasure. Yet because He is holy and perfect, He cannot give us pleasure just any old way. We quickly find that when we are calling the shots for what constitutes pleasure, we are soon disappointed and turn away unsatisfied. Only He knows what will give us true pleasure and only He can provide it: be it in direct vertical communication with Him or with a joyful horizontal participation with all of His creation.
There is something beautiful about being in a creature to creature relationship sharing the joint pleasure of fellowship with our Creator. C.S. Lewis liked to think of heaven as a stringed symphony: each of us is uniquely equipped to respond to the precise combinations of His attributes: no two are exactly alike. This produces a mutually complementary harmony instead of a monotone drone, the swelling strains of the saxophone and clarinet complementing the violin and the bass drum: the tuba and the trombone trading off with the trumpet and flute. We lose the full picture when we assume that since God alone can fill the vacuum, we were meant to go the road alone here on earth. There are times, to be sure, we will be disappointed and lonely, but it will all make the sweet fellowship we share one day be all the much sweeter.
God is a God of order, not of disorder: God is a God of unity. Discord and strife do not come from the Father, but rather from the evil one damned by his own sentient choice. It was not unity he sought, but solidarity. He chose not to enjoy the fellowship of God and His fellow angels, but instead sought to exalt himself at the expense of unity. While there cannot be peace at any price, peace will never be obtained by exalting self, for it renders the enjoyment of pleasure hollow: it exalts gift above Giver and makes too much of a good thing.
A Triune God, perfect amongst all His members, knew what it was to live in an eternal love relationship: Father loves Son, Son loves Father, and the Spirit flows between the two, taking His own delight in the transaction. So too, a Triune God is meant to be enjoyed by us, creature to creature, linked hand in hand in the meadow of creation before the Creator—the songbirds and the doe with fawn, the stringed symphonies of the crickets, the brook murmuring softly as it trickles down the mountainside—all of creation in worship and praise of the Creator. This composite picture is intended to fill the vacuum, the Capstone locking the puzzle solidly into place: there is no greater giver than God.
How about you, sister, brother? Do you see the beauty in all of this? Do you see why the temporal can only be understood by a recognition of the eternal? Why our deepest longings will not forever give way to our greatest fears? On earth as it is in heaven: the temporal frames will be transformed into perfected vessels to house the eternal portrait—the imago Dei—that will forever enjoy, as creature to creature in all of creation, fellowship with the Creator for all eternity. Can you think of anything more beautiful than that?
I hope this has given you some further food for thought.
God bless,
Eric
Replies: